declaratory judgment texas family law declaratory judgment texas family law

2.401 (a) (West 2006) Many of our courses are available here. 1989). endobj 2283. See Employers Cas. <> Allstate Ins. at 1280 (insurer not precluded from relitigating course and scope of employment). The court may refuse to render or enter a declaratory judgment or decree if the judgment or decree would not terminate the uncertainty or controversy giving rise to the proceeding. Start with the updated Protecting Family Rights course. Even before the Texas Supreme Courts opinion in Griffin, federal courts recognized that indemnity presented an actual controversy and was justiciable, prior to judgment in the underlying liability suit. The complaint allegation rule can pose a problem with declaratory relief. App.Houston [14th Dist.] 1997); Trinity Universal Ins. The award is subject to reversal only if it is arbitrary and unreasonable. Co. v. Bailey, 133 F.3d 363, 368 (5th Cir. Frontier Pac. Under Texas substantive law, attorneys fees may be available to the insured if the insurer has breached its duty to defend or indemnify. (no right to new trial because of amended petition where suit brought and determined based on prior petition). 1999) (insureds motion to transfer erroneously granted); Southern County Mut. (a) A court of record within its jurisdiction has power to declare rights, status, and other legal relations whether or not further relief is or could be claimed. The court in Griffin relied upon a change in the Texas Constitution, expanding the scope of district court jurisdiction and eliminating the minimum amount in controversy. App.Houston [1st Dist.] 2 0 obj relief is or could be sought." 28 U.S.C. Costs and fees are not dependent upon the outcome, and can be awarded to either the prevailing or the non-prevailing party. 9 0 obj As long as both parties agree to the three elements listed in Section 2.401, they meet the requirements of a common law marriage. See State Farm Mut. A plaintiff is the side that starts the lawsuit by filing a complaint or petition with the court.A plaintiff files the lawsuit to get the court to force the defendant to do something, such as pay money damages. See, e.g., Stroop v. N. County Mut. COPYRIGHT: All of the materials are copyrighted. at 313. 1995); but cf. To establish federal jurisdiction in a declaratory judgment action, two conditions must be satisfied. The court, in the coverage action, concluded that there was a conflict of interest and a lack of privity, and therefore the insurer was not collaterally estopped from re-litigating the existence of false imprisonment. (d) In determining whether to grant declaratory relief to a business under this section, a court shall consider: (1) the factual circumstances of the business's operations that give rise to the demand by the other state; and. (a) A court of record within its jurisdiction has power to declare rights, status, and other legal relations whether or not further relief is or could be claimed. The Fifth Circuit overruled prior case law to conform with the Supreme Courts ruling. At issue was a declaratory judgment action over whether medical expenses were owed to an insured worker, under The Workers Compensation Act, where the expenses were incurred after settlement of the employees negligence suit against a third party. 1994). See Travelers Ins. A Declaratory Judgment allows you to establish with your court what your rights are before you take steps which might involve you in costly litigation. 1 0 obj 1994), the court reviewed abstention doctrine in relation to declaratory judgment actions. denied) (disallowing evidence of workers compensation payments to establish employment). Co. v. Deering Mgmt. 37.002 (b) (Vernon 2008); see Bonham State Bank, 907 S.W.2d at 467; Indian Beach Property Owners' Ass'n v. App. As a constitutional family rights expert researcher and writer, Sherry helps parents and their attorneys see the possibilities in making constitutional arguments for parental rights as being in the childs best interests. Burch involved a declaration that the insurer owed defense, and also owed indemnity for the insureds liability for his wifes torts. 1997); Heyden Newport Chemical Corp. v. So. River Entertainment was joined because it owned Pepes where the defendant imbibed. In this instance, there may be legitimate concerns that the insurers discovery will inure to the benefit of the liability plaintiff, which is likely not in the interest of either the insured or the insurer. 5 0 obj denied) (any judgment on indemnity was advisory and beyond power and jurisdiction of the court); Campbell v. Commercial Standard Ins. denied); Ranger Ins. Id. 1998, pet. <> You may not reproduce or sell this material or copy it into other training without express permission from Ron or Sherry Palmer in writing. A binding adjudication of the rights and status of litigants even though no consequential relief is awarded. 2201. You can share these posts as long as you are linking to our posts. CIV. Co. v. Boll, 392 S.W.2d 158, 161 (Tex. P., also addresses declaratory judgments, by reference to 28 U.S.C. Can I Still File if I am already in Costly Litigation? 1968). Civ. Individuals may seek a declaratory judgment after a legal controversy has arisen . v. Mitchell, 138 F.3d 208, 210 (5th Cir. App. Co. v. Gandy, 925 S.W.2d 696 (Tex. Texas Pattern Jury Charges, published by the State Bar of Texas, is a compilation of definitions, jury instructions, and supplemental material, intended to assist practitioners with developing jury charges. See, e.g., State Farm Lloyds v. Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. In addition to the county of the defendants residence or principal office, venue is generally deemed proper in the county where the liability suit is pending, or judgment is entered. Sec. Co. v. Murray, 437 S.W.2d 264, 265-66 (Tex. Eskew, 731 S.W.2d 124, 132 (Tex.App.-Austin 1987, writ ref'd n.r.e.) Co. v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Fedn, Inc., 996 F.2d 774, 778 (5th Cir. Volumes are organized by broad practice area and are generally sold individually, since few practitioners have need for all of them. <> endobj Co. v. Sweatt, 978 S.W.2d 267 (Tex. 1978). September 1, 2007. Section 6.204 of the Texas Family Code still states that same-sex marriages are void, but that law is no longer enforceable. In a straight complaint allegation case, for instance, there should be extremely limited discovery, beyond verification of the pleadings and the policy. The right to award costs and fees is discretionary, not mandatory. Co. v. River Entertainment, 998 F.2d 311, 315 (5th Cir. LEXIS 1736 (Tex. We are not attorneys. Thompson Coe on Best Lawyers Best Law Firms List for 12th Consecutive Year, Four Years Later: The Impact of Texas Insurance Code Section 542A.006 on Insurance Litigation, Texas Supreme Court Reverses Appeals Court Judgment, Affirms Trial Win for Thompson Coe Client, Developing Texas Insurance Law in the Appellate Courts, Update & Recap: Winter Storm Uri and Impact on Gulf Coast Coverage Cases, The Good, The Bad, The Ugly: Texas Appraisals, NEW June PC Webinar: Insurance Retrospective, Texas Supreme Court Issues Significant Decision on Exception to Eight Corners Rule, 2801 Via Fortuna Sherry attributes successfully developing the most powerful tools and a five-stage formula to assist attorneys and pro se parents get better results and fight legal abuses that occur in the family court settings. See, e.g., City of Galveston v. Giles, 902 S.W.2d 167 (Tex. App.Dallas 1998, pet. Co. v. Carmichael, 1998 Tex. POWER OF COURTS TO RENDER JUDGMENT; FORM AND EFFECT. 8. As a preliminary consideration, counsel for the insurer should be careful and selective in what is requested. Texas law does not require the couple to be together for a specific period of time before they can declare themselves to be in a common law marriage. Id. P. 301; Logan v. Mullis, 686 S.W.2d 605, 609 (Tex . In state court, an order to seal discovery requires that the parties jump through a number of additional hoops, but protective orders are still available. Courts have struggled with the issue of what can be resolved in the declaratory judgment action, when the issue determining coverage may also be material in the underlying case. (B) asserts a claim that the party seeking declaratory relief is required to collect sales or use taxes for that state based on conduct of the business that occurs in whole or in part within this state. The U.S. Supreme Court's 2015 ruling in Obergefell v. Rule 57, FED. Sec. Co. v. Childress, 650 S.W.2d 770, 775-76 (Tex. 61 Miscellaneous Litigation , Form 61-15: Petition for Declaratory Judgment; Practice Notes 61.10 Declaratory Judgment Dorsaneo's Texas Litigation Guide KFT 1730.T4 Vol. Admiral Ins. Co., 975 S.W.2d 329, 332 (Tex. Co. v. Ochoa, 19 S.W.3d 452 (Tex. Civ. See Firemens Ins. Respondent contends the Supreme Court's holding in Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015), the "state courts are split as to whether the ruling (in Obergefell) applies retroactively to any marriage." Respondent's Mtn. xX]oF}G?SeW0W44q>EqU{s@N|Bt2&iw'PmH'4QH1_>{'Y7bLH dB4uX;iYtI7F7*L^F 305 (H.B. An action or proceeding is not open to objection on the ground that a declaratory judgment or decree is prayed for." - Texas Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act VERHOEV V.PROGRESSIVE COUNTY MUTUAL INS.CO., 300 S.W.3D 803 (TEX.APP.. - FT.WORTH 2009) Personal auto policy Glenn and Kim Verhoev both named insureds $250,000 limits (UM/UIM) Divorced prior to issuance of policy and accident Kim injured severely in a single vehicle roll over as a passenger in a vehicle driven and owned by Glenn Kim pursued both a liability claim against Glenn All Rights Reserved. [i] UNIFORM DECLARATORY JUDGMENTS ACT paper by NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMMISSIONERS ON UNIFORM STATE LAWS at the conference in San Francisco on August 2-8, 1922. The District Court of Delaware dismissed a generic drug company's declaratory judgment counterclaims of non-infringement and invalidity, finding that the court no longer had subject. 1968) (J. Smith, dissenting). 955 S.W.2d at 84 (construing Tex. Ins. See Brillhart v. Excess Ins. Where Can I Get More Information and Training? (because claimant could not bring suit, she had no right to intervene); see, e.g., Graciela v. Tagle, 946 S.W.2d 504 (Tex. (whether driver qualified as an insured); John Deere Ins. App.Houston [14th Dist.] 959, 1, eff. Protective orders are still relatively simple, and can usually be subject to an agreed motion in federal court. Genl Agency v. Cooper, 952 S.W.2d 861 (Tex. App.Austin 1999, no pet.) If the discovery is limited, or poorly conducted, or does not address the coverage issues, however, the insurer may seek additional testimony and evidence. Twenty-Fifth Floor - Plaza of the Americas. Tex. LEXIS 7982 (Tex. See, e.g., Ruth v. Imperial Ins. As Texas law remains uncertain regarding reimbursement of defense costs, and as many insureds are not financially capable of repayment, the defense issue may be rendered moot either practically or legally by delay. The insurer refused to pay the judgment, on the basis that the insureds conduct constituted a willful violation of a penal statute, and was thus excluded by the policy. 1965, writ refd n.r.e.) On the other hand, the existence of another remedy, or unresolved issues, does not preclude declaratory relief. Id . for Declaratory Judgment at 3. may declare the rights. Civ. The most common exception for extrinsic evidence is when the pleadings simply do not assert facts that would determine coverage. (a)For Claimant. Tex. An action or proceeding is not open to objection on the ground that a declaratory judgment or decree is prayed for. Texas Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, You can get sample motions here: Declaratory Relief Declaratory Judgment and Rights. App.Texarkana 2003, pet. V 8). * Associate Professor of Law, Texas Tech University School of Law. 168 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<9A8DD3395C28F34D981E9CD96490FD9D>]/Index[140 50]/Info 139 0 R/Length 129/Prev 481282/Root 141 0 R/Size 190/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream Co. v. Fraiman, 514 S.W.2d 343, 346 (Tex. 37.002. dismd, 507 U.S. 1026 (1993); cf. denied, 511 U.S. 1032 (1994). 1969); see also Allstate Ins. Federated Mut. However, each party must still plead for relief and carry its own burden of proof. The insured was located in Hidalgo County, the car was purchased in Hidalgo County, and the salesman contacted the agent by phone, from Hidalgo County, to add the car to the policy. Despite its title, this order would not be a final judgment because it does not dispose of all claims at issue in the lawsuit. Thus, an insured can seek an affirmative finding of coverage, or an insurer can seek a negative determination that coverage does not exist. The above information is taken from the Palmers training on their sample motions, parental rights motions. We are not responsible for you using any of this information. 1965). & Rem. Ins. 11 0 obj Why File a Declaratory Judgment in State Court? at 332. App.Dallas 1992, writ denied); U.S. Fire Ins. App.San Antonio 1965), affd, 396 S.W.2d 855 (holding state court had no jurisdiction to render advisory opinion while prior suit was pending on appeal in Fifth Circuit, despite federal courts voluntary stay). 1271 (N.D. Tex. App.Austin, Oct. 2, 2003, no pet. The Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 37.005. provides that: Genl Ins. See State Farm Fire & Cas. " (emphasis added)). 1, eff. Ins. c) The court may grant summary judgment as to liability only and leave damages for the jury, as appropriate. Where the insurer is providing a defense, it is a party to the attorney-client privilege, and can share in communications between the insured and defense counsel, without waiver. See TEX. Co. v. Griffin, 955 S.W.2d 81 (Tex. ***It is your responsibility to make sure that this is appropriate for your individual case. . In determining amount in controversy, the court may consider policy limits and defense costs, and is not necessarily limited by the damages pleaded in the underlying suit. If your state does not have a declaratory judgment statute that provides you the ability to be heard on your constitutional rights consider filing in federal court for this relief. endobj Read this complete Texas Estates Code - EST 257.101. Sec.A37.003.AAPOWER OF COURTS TO RENDER JUDGMENT; FORM AND EFFECT. The issue becomes more murky when allegations triggering coverage are alleged, but are in conflict with the actual facts. Despite the complaint allegation rule, Texas courts have always recognized that there are circumstances in which the court must look to extrinsic evidence to determine whether a duty to defend exists. Typically, an anti-suit injunction is appropriate in limited instances: 1) to address a threat to the courts jurisdiction; 2) to prevent the evasion of important public policy; 3) to prevent a multiplicity of suits; or 4) to protect a party from vexatious or harassing litigation. Co. v. Tilley, 484 S.W.2d 802, 806 (Tex. Local venue flavor/influences II. App.Beaumont 1972), affd other grounds, 496 S.W.2d 552 (Tex. 1998, no pet.). %%EOF 1995) (whether trademark violation occurred during policy period). Ins. It is not an abuse of discretion, however, to retain a suit, and to decide issues of indemnity, even before the underlying liability suit has reached judgment. Where suits are filed in two states, one court may abstain in favor of the first-filed suit. App.San Antonio 1998, pet. Code 6.305 (a) (1)- (2). Under state or federal law, declaratory relief is only appropriate when there is an actual case or controversy. 7) whether the federal court is being called on to construe a state judicial decree involving the same parties and entered by the court before whom the parallel state suit between the same parties is pending. Through the years, many family lawyers have recommended taking additional steps to assure the sanctity of a partition agreement, including initiating a declaratory judgment action to seek a. d) The court may also grant summary judgment against the moving party, if appropriate. Instead, a party may recover fees only where controlling substantive law permits recovery. Rule 57 also notes that "the existence of another adequate remedy does not preclude a judgment for declaratory relief in cases where it is appropriate." A developing issue has been the extent to which declaratory relief is available to determine an insurers indemnity obligations, while the underlying suit is pending. 1995). 1445(c) and federal abstention principles. & Rem. Prac. Co. v. Merchants Fast Motor Lines, Inc., 939 S.W.2d 139 (Tex. 37.003. and that a prior judgment is void. Id. Typically, the first-filed suit has dominant jurisdiction. The answer may depend upon whether the insurer has defended or simply denied coverage, and the extent to which the issue is actually material to, and fully litigated in, the underlying dispute. Because there was no judgment in the liability suit, the court concluded that any declaration regarding indemnity would be purely hypothetical.1 In 1997, the Supreme Court concluded that the law had changed, however, and determined that a declaration of indemnity was available, when the same facts that defeated a duty to defend also defeated a duty to indemnify. 1993). 167, Sec. Civ. See, e.g., Cook v. Ohio Cas. Rule 166a - Summary Judgment. Rules 38 and 39 govern a demand for a jury trial. 830-252-5100. He then filed a lawsuit seeking a declaratory judgment that Allstate owed him the difference between the settlement . ), Code of Judical Conduct, Canon 3 B (c) obtaining the advice of a disinterested expert on the law applicable to a proceeding before the judge if the judge gives notice to the parties of the person consulted and the substance of the advice, and affords the parties reasonable opportunity to respond;. If the order resolves the entire action, then the answer is easy. 1969); Getty Oil v. Ins. The Fifth Circuit reviewed abstention under the Burford and Colorado River doctrines, and concluded that neither was applicable. App.Houston [1st Dist.] App.Corpus Christi 1975, writ refd n.r.e.) The march towards a nation-wide fulfillment of the concept suf-fered a temporary setback in 1910 by the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Muskrat v. United States. County Mut. App.San Antonio 1998, pet. 97, 99 (E.D. endobj 2005); In re Marriage of Byrne, 179 Ill.App.3d 944 (1st Dist. App.El Paso 1976, writ refd n.r.e.) As such, there should be no collateral estoppel of the insurer, based upon the outcome of the issue in the underlying case. ("[B]ecause the trial court judgment rests upon the specific grounds set out in the findings of fact and conclusions of law that accompany the judgment, we are not permitted to assume omitted findings or conclusions necessary to any other grounds for the judgment, even . Co. v. Tex. Co. v. Burch, 442 S.W.2d 331 (Tex. 2023 Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, LLP. Co. v. Vandewater, 907 S.W.2d 491 (Tex. Sec. 2201, and further provides for a jury trial. endobj endobj denied). Civ. (a) A person interested under a deed, will, written contract, or other writings constituting a contract or whose rights, status, or other legal relations are affected by a statute, municipal ordinance, contract, or franchise may have determined any question of construction or validity arising under the instrument, statute, ordinance, contract, or franchise and obtain a declaration of rights, status, or other legal relations thereunder. )1^Hl]TgxY8Ubs,! 9@Dyp*l8sA!N\X App.Austin 2003, no pet. 1996). A declaratory judgment is a binding judgment from a court defining the legal relationship between parties and their rights in a matter before the court. SEGURA.POSTMACRO.3 (DO NOT DELETE) 6/19/2015 8:20 AM DISPUTING THE BOUNDARY OF THE DECLARATORY JUDGMENTS ACT Philip Thomas Segura* I. TRESPASS TO TRY TITLE OR DECLARATORY JUDGMENTS ACT Texas state law provides that "[a] trespass to try title action is the method of determining title to lands, tenements, or other real property."1 In Texas, this is the only method of resolving property . 37.001. Co., 981 S.W.2d 861 (Tex. The insurer denied defense based on the liquor liability exclusion and filed a declaratory judgment action. No. [i]Since the state requires that you file some sort of lawsuit to protect your rights and time to your child and your property, and most state statutes authorize the use of state power to affect these rights, you should consider using declaratory judgment to establish what process and procedure your court will use to protect you and your child from the harm of a court completely ignoring process and procedure required for fundamental rights. All orders, judgments, and decrees under this chapter may be reviewed as other orders, judgments, and decrees. Co. v. Watson, 876 S.W.2d 145, 149 (Tex. App.Houston [1st Dist.] "Undoubtedly, the degree of control the agreement ultimately exerts over the parties' rights in the . Guar. 37.003. Co. v. Bailey, 133 F.3d 363, 368 (5th Cir. Co. v. Gandy, 925 S.W.2d 696 (Tex. There are exceptions, of course. Wade, 827 S.W.2d at 451. 4 . The El Paso Court of Appeals recently considered Eggemeyer v. Hughes, a case involving a disputed boundary line. In re Houston Specialty Insurance Co., 569 S.W.3d 138 (Tex. In a number of instances, courts have concluded that an insurer is entitled to re-litigate issues. Co. of Texas, 1998 Tex. Courts recognize that when there are conflicting positions on coverage, as when the insurer reserves rights, there is no privity between the insured and the insurer on issues relating to coverage, which are also at issue in the underlying case. Group v. Lou-Con, Inc., 293 F.3d 908 (5th Cir. See, e.g., Texas Assn of Bus. . denied) (judgment of negligence in underlying case did not establish that negligent acts caused bodily injury, and did not preclude insurer from establishing intentional conduct); Deering Mgmt. (a) This chapter may be cited as the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act. ^9@VXB-'C(SOZ#jGT"1kfWj7i,9^'EJ P. 76A; 192.6(b)(5). 1974, no writ). In any proceeding under this chapter, the court may award costs and reasonable and necessary attorney's fees as are equitable and just. denied sub nom. A declaration does not prejudice the rights of a person not a party to the proceeding. 713-403-8210, 601 Poydras Co. v. Kelliher, 343 S.W.2d 278 (Tex. For our purposes, "litigation" refers to the filing and prosecuting of a real estate-related lawsuit, or defense against one, in the Texas county civil courts at law or the civil district courts. 1998) (holding that Texas Declaratory Judgment Act was not controlling, substantive law, and did not justify fee award to defendants). Rule 57 also notes that the existence of another adequate remedy does not preclude a judgment for declaratory relief in cases where it is appropriate. In addition, Rule 57 provides that the court may order a speedy hearing as an action for a declaratory judgment and may advance it on the calendar.. Co., 628 S.W.2d 184 (Tex. Sec. The crop-dusting involved only one flight, but several passes during which herbicide was released, and during which wind direction and velocity varied. 512-708-8200, 700 North Pearl Street stream 1997) (whether vehicle was owned by insured); Harken Exploration Co. v. Sphere Drake Ins., PLC, 261 F.3d 466 (5th Cir. See Fed. See United Services Life Ins. On the other hand, in some instances, principally those in which only indemnity is at issue, or where stay or abstention is likely, there may be no benefit to early filing. Ins. R. Civ. App.Austin 1998, no pet. E.g., Wilton v. Seven Falls Co., 515 U.S. 277 (1995); American States Ins. denied), the court held it was permissible, and not purely advisory, to determine the number of occurrences involved in the underlying litigation. Go to this page for more information on this path: Federal Court Declaratory Relief Declaratory Judgment sample motions. See Firemans Ins. On the other hand, where the insured seeks a declaration that the insurer owes indemnity, before resolution of the underlying case, the opinion may be considered advisory, and declaratory relief may, indeed, be premature. A declaration does not prejudice the rights of a person not a party to the proceeding. endobj Sept. 1, 1985. (1) a party seeking declaratory relief that is a business that is: (A) organized under the laws of this state or is otherwise owned by a resident of this state; or (B) a retailer registered with the comptroller under Section 151.106, Tax Code; and (2) a responding party that: (A) is an official of another state; and As with the state act, one of the exceptions allows a federal court to enjoin re-litigation in state court to protect or effectuate its judgments. See Royal Ins. Ellison sought a declaratory judgment to that effect and also brought claims for trespass to try title, trespass to real property, conversion, unlawful drainage, gross negligence, and nonpayment of oil and gas proceeds. The court recognized that the insurer was defending, but the coverage issue would not be litigated in the underlying case, so declaratory relief was appropriate. Declaratory Judgments Act) Texas CPRC Plus REF KFT 1728.A196 A2 CPRC Ch. 2d 719 (S.D. Texas Declaratory Judgment Law United States of America v. Vijesh Patel, M.D. denied); see also State Farm Fire & Cas. App.Houston 1965, writ refd n.r.e.) The Western Heritage case epitomizes the argument for use of extrinsic evidence. Co. v. Merchants Fast Motor Lines, Inc., 939 S.W.2d 139 (Tex. Insrs v. American Home Assur. Civ. COURT REFUSAL TO RENDER. San Antonio, TX 78216 App.Houston [1st Dist.] 189 0 obj <>stream Tex. Civ. App.Texarkana 1994, no writ) (possibility that liability triggering indemnity would be incurred was a feature hypothetical event, and court had no power to pass upon hypothetical or contingent situation); Fort Worth Lloyds v. Garza, 527 S.W.2d 195 (Tex. A declaratory judgment is a legal determination by the court, which resolves legal uncertainties in a controversy. As amended through January 27, 2023. The collision was also in Hidalgo County, as was the liability suit. Other Resources you might find helpful to help you get through the stress and emotional turmoil involved during the time that you have uncertainty and fear of losing your child and control over your life and your money: **It is your responsibility to prove that the PALMERS qualify as an expert in your state and can testify. A declaratory judgment must be based on an actual controversy, and cannot be merely advisory. App.El Paso 2000, no pet. Co. v. Block, 744 S.W.2d 940, 943 (Tex. <> App.San Antonio 1998, pet. Citing the Travelers case, the court recited the relevant factors the court must consider in determining whether to dismiss a declaratory judgment action: 1) whether there is a pending state action in which all of the matters in controversy may be fully litigated; 2) whether the plaintiff filed suit in anticipation of a lawsuit filed by the defendant; 3) whether the plaintiff engaged in forum shopping in bringing the suit; 4) whether possible inequities in allowing the declaratory plaintiff to gain precedence in time or to change forums exist; 5) whether the federal court is a convenient forum for the parties and witnesses; 6) whether retaining the lawsuit in federal court would serve the purposes of judicial economy; and. P. 26; Tex. A justiciable controversy requires a real and substantial controversy over tangibles interests, and not merely a theoretical dispute. Co., 2000 Tex. See, e.g., State Farm Fire & Cas. The policy provided limits of $100,000 per occurrence and $200,000 in the aggregate. A defendant is the side the lawsuit has been filed against.The defendant is the party that may have to pay money damages or perform some other action if the plaintiff wins and the . 19821 DECLARATORY JUDGMENTS IN TEXAS their statutory law. In Williamson, a jury awarded the claimant damages against the insured for false imprisonment. Nor can an insurer join the claimants and address the issues through interpleader. Sept. 1, 1999. dismd, 507 U.S. 1026 (1993). See, e.g., Commercial Metals Co. v. Balfour, Guthrie & Co., Ltd., 577 F.2d 264 (5th Cir. !`g)a00-k@@eU Group, Inc., 946 F.Supp. You may use the information for your individual case only. Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 37.007. The Historic Hamm Building Texas, Inc., 64 S.W.3d 497 (Tex. SHORT TITLE, CONSTRUCTION, INTERPRETATION. (not justiciable controversy); Foust v. Ranger Ins. [ii]Civil Practice and Remedies Code Declaratory Judgments Sec 37.002 and Sec 37.003 (c) (c) The enumerations in Sections 37.004 and 37.005 do not limit or restrict the exercise of the general powers conferred in this section in any proceeding in which declaratory relief is sought and a judgment or decree will terminate the controversy or remove an uncertainty. Amended by Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. Id. 37.008 provides that the court may refuse to render a declaratory judgment if the judgment would not terminate the uncertainty or controversy giving rise to the proceeding. Prac. App. 1996). A Texas court may also enjoin the litigants from moving forward on the same issues in any other jurisdiction. Austin, TX 78746 endobj Cf. App.Houston [14th Dist.] Default judgment presumes that the plaintiff spouse properly served the lawsuit on the defendant-and that the defendant then failed to respond in a timely manner, either by choice or due to neglect. There are exceptions, however, (1) when conduct estops a party from asserting prior active jurisdiction; (2) where parties are lacking; or (3) where there is lack of intent to prosecute. See McCarthy Bros. Co. v. Continental Lloyds, 7 S.W.3d 725 (Tex. 1998). Co. v. Burch, 442 S.W.2d 331 (Tex. Rule 38(c), TEX. In older cases, courts allowed broad introduction of extrinsic evidence in a declaratory judgment context.