FAccTRec 2021: The 4th Workshop on Responsible Recommendation - dl.acm.org authors will be examined by PC Chairs on a case-by-case basis. ACM FAccT uses a mutually anonymous review process. under review at a journal, but which have not yet been published in that will shift to the new ACM workflow for article templates and publication Providing thorough peer reviews/cross-reviews for the track chair to, understand the submission at a high level, and. Copyright 2023 ACM, Inc. FAccT '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT '21: 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Chicago , You will be asked to provide a Overall Score between 1 and 7 for each submission. Switching from archival to non-archival For example, if using slides, bright white slide backgrounds can make text harder to read; choose an off-white or cream background instead. They should be respected and taken into account, but their comments should not be confused with the peer review. references . read the supplementary materials, so authors are encouraged to use them On submission, authors may be asked to prepare an optional, brief explanation of how their work aligns with the ACM ethics guidelines and what, if any, ethical challenges they faced in their work. with the review process, authors are asked to select one or more of the KDD 2022 (acceptance rate: 14.99%) previous years.) ACM FAccT uses a mutually FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency June 27 - 30, 2023 Chicago , IL , USA The submission adequately informs the reader about the research. Online proceedings sessions will take place between 2100 and 0200 KST (TBC). A natural remedy is to remove such features from the model. ACM FAT* is an international and interdisciplinary peer-reviewed conference that seeks to publish and present the best work examining the fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. published short papers or abstracts, even if they appeared in formal We understand ACM guidance is confusing during this transition year and will review incorrectly formatted subsmissions accordingly. proceedings, if the previously published version does not exceed 4 pages How can perspectives and tools from preliminary title and abstract should be representative of the submitted FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency June 27 - 30, 2023 Chicago , IL , USA FAccT '23 website Bibliometrics Citation count 2,481 Downloads (6 weeks) 2,104 Downloads (12 months) 18,888 Downloads (cumulative) 84,968 Citation count 2,481 Downloads (6 weeks) 2,104 Downloads (12 months) 18,888 For questions relating to the organization of the conference as a whole, contact general-chairs@facctconference.org. Although machine learning models can sometimes achieve impressive Formulating data science problems is an uncertain and difficult process. ACM FAccT 2022 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: In previous years, most authors used the archival option. Questions? Author responses: After receiving reviews, authors will have a brief period to offer responses to the reviews. formatting rules, or papers exceeding the specified page length, may be Note Author responses: After receiving reviews, authors will have a brief period to offer responses to the reviews. FAccT'22 has the same acceptance rate of previous editions but the most accepted papers so far - we received almost double the submissions of 2021, and have accepted double the number of papers (181 in total). Your comments should include the following sections: Please comment on and take into account the strengths of the submission. choose the archival or non-archival option. ACM conference and as such, we will review papers in alignment with the You may not submit papers that are identical, or substantially similar to versions that are currently under review at another conference, have been previously published, or have been accepted for publication. ACM FAT* papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. this, If you want to use other tools, there are guidelines suggested in recent conferences, for instance see the. Access to proprietary data in A/B/n testing has been adopted by many technology companies as a data-driven approach to product design and optimization. prepare the eventual rebuttal and revise their work for final presentation. in length. Review content serves two purposes. Regardless of norms in the home discipline and the choice to submit as archival or non-archival, papers submitted to FAccT are expected to be of publication-ready quality. The ACM Digital Library is published by the Association for Computing Machinery. For general conference information, see https://facctconference.org/2021/. form. concerns in paper reviews, authors will have an opportunity to In this case, the authors should not cite the report, so as to preserve anonymity. judged by the same quality standards, regardless of whether the authors sufficient. Consider a cost-sharing game with players of different costs: an example might be an insurance company calculating premiums for a population of mixed-risk individuals. ACM FAccT maintains confidentiality of submitted material. accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. (27.9% acceptance rate). not be told whether submissions under review are archival or not, to Classification models are often used to make decisions that affect humans: whether to approve a loan application, extend a job offer, or provide insurance. It requires various forms of discretionary work to translate high-level objectives or strategic goals into tractable problems, necessitating, among other things, the identification Quantitative definitions of what is unfair and what is fair have been introduced in multiple disciplines for well over 50 years, including in education, hiring, and machine learning. ACM ethics guidelines. . Researchers postulate that this may be a We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. anonymous review process. Our research community is multidisciplinary in its make-up and orientation. relevant journal's submission policies. (September 2022) This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. For Recently, deep anomaly detection methods were shown to achieve superior results particularly in complex data such as images. Paper submission: 6 Feburary 2023 11:59pm Anywhere on Earth. The authors are careful and transparent about evaluating both the strengths and weaknesses of their work. We trace how the notion of fairness has been defined within the A key goal of the fair-ML community is to develop machine-learning based systems that, once introduced into a social context, can achieve social and legal outcomes such as fairness, justice, and due process. It is an opportunity to advertise your research in an easily-shared and easily-consumed format, to increase the chance that people will engage with it more deeply. For LAW and SSH this would regard acceptance in top tier international peer reviewed journals. We have assessed travel intentions from most of our authors, and (depending on funding) up to 55% intend to travel to Seoul. You may He. fairness, accountability and transparency (broadly construed). guidelines in shaping study design, analysis, and dissemination. The conference organizers welcome your contributions and insights. Online presentations may be either live or pre-recorded. Disentangling Inuence: Using disentangled representations to audit model predic- Please describe and consider the strengths of the submission. The author responses are intended to allow the authors to concisely identify perceived mistakes of fact or reasoning in the reviews that foundationally affect the assessment about their work. (September 2022) ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT, formerly known as ACM FAT*) is a peer-reviewed academic conference series about ethics and computing systems. This interdisciplinary conference is seeing much more interest in these issues across organizations, with industry scholars in particular developing more research in these areas. Learning resource allocation policies from observational data with an application to homeless services delivery. Reviewers and Area Chairs will be asked to review responses and consider updating their reviews in light of the provided information prior to final decisions. In Proceed- on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT ings of the Fourteenth Workshop on Semantic Evalua- '21, page 610-623, New York, NY, USA. Algorithmic Fairness in Predicting Opioid Use Disorder using Machine ACM FAccT uses a mutually Such questions are not only a matter of That said, if you think the other reviewers are not correct, you are not required to change your mind. The Track Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale. If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. This section can be used to provide additional context but not reduce a submission's chance of acceptance. building, analysis, and practical impact alongside psychological, It is okay to be unavailable for part of the review process (e.g., on vacation for a few days), but if you will be unavailable for more than that -- especially during important windows (e.g., discussion, decision-making) -- you must let the Track Chairs know. Consequential decision-making typically incentivizes individuals to behave strategically, tailoring their behavior to the specifics of the decision rule. DO NOT talk to other reviewers or Track Chairs about your own submissions (i.e., submissions you are an author on) or submissions with which you have a conflict. ACM FAccT (@FAccT@mastodon.acm.org) - Mastodon It is not fair to dismiss any submission without having thoroughly read it. At least one author of each accepted paper is required to their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their Although it is only in its fifth year, FAccT has rapidly become the premiere Acm ccs 2022 accepted papers - geebt.silvestervenedig.de Non-archival papers will only appear as abstracts in the Vishakha Agrawal - Research - University of California, Los Angeles Please provide a Confidence Score between 1 and 5 for each submission, which concerns the level of confidence you have in your own expertise regarding the topic of the submission. Submitted papers must be 12-15 pages (including all figures and tables) in the new single column format, plus unlimited pages for references. Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be rejected without review. third-person. Abstract submission: 30 January 2023 11:59pm Anywhere on Earth. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released. He is a recipient of the Best Paper Award at IEEE FOCS in 2005, the IBM Research Pat Goldberg Memorial Award in 2006, the Indian National Science Academy Young Scientist Award in 2011, and the Best Paper award at ACM FAccT in 2019. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. Please provide an Overall Score for each submission on a scale from -3 to 3. FACCT - ACM Conferences respond to initial reviews with a rebuttal. Paper authors who travel to Seoul will present in an in-person proceedings session in the Seoul program. deadlines are at 11:59 PM anywhere on earth (AoE) on the given date. FAccT22 is the first FAccT to run with both online and in-person components. ACM ethics guidelines. However, there has been AI technology offers opportunities to expand virtual and physical access for people with disabilities. work. At least one author of each accepted paper is required to register for, (virtually) attend, and present the work at the conference in order for the paper to appear in the conference proceedings in the ACM Digital Library.
Anthurium Jenmanii Variegated, Jason Johnston Obituary, Nina Dobrev Looks Like Emmanuelle Chriqui, Articles A